All English posts


Logo

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk presented information in Parliament concerning the priorities of the Polish Presidency, which will commence on 1 July this year. The Prime Minister emphasised that during the Presidency the government wants not just to maintain but to increase Poland’s status as a responsible and highly valued state.
“It is expected that the Presidency will allow us to jointly create political leadership which does not consist of taking routine decisions but which may help the EU as a whole,” he said. “It is of paramount importance that during the Presidency we can maintain and increase Poland’s status as a country which is highly valued in internal EU debates and which demonstrates a high level of responsibility with regard to the EU’s foreign relations,” he underlined, adding that Poland will also want to maintain and increase its status as a responsible country in dealing with economic and financial issues.
The Prime Minister stressed that Poland has developed its image as a state which is capable of being a new driving force in the European Union. “Today Poland is treated as one of the leaders – of which unfortunately there are few in the EU – which strive to force through issues of EU-wide significance,” stated the Prime Minister. In his view, from the beginning of the economic crisis Poland constantly came out against the revival of state control and nationalism which was visible in the actions and statements of some politicians and EU Member States.
Mr Tusk drew attention to the fact that it is important for good political initiatives to emerge during the Polish Presidency. “We have a significant interest in Poland’s Presidency being remembered by Europeans through issues including the finalising of long-term processes,” he said. “It is possible that during the Polish Presidency we will see the completion of negotiations with Croatia, which would mean that the accession treaty will be signed during the Presidency,” stated the Prime Minister. He added that completion of negotiations with Ukraine on an association agreement and agreement on free trade is also realistic. “This would be the first successful step in the process of bringing Ukraine closer to Europe,” the Prime Minister stated.

Full article - Polish Presidency of the EU.


It will not be easy for Kiev’s Court to determine whether Ms. Yulia Tymoshenko is victim of a plot or she is really guilty. The former heroine of the pro-European Orange Revolution in November 2004 is accused of “abuse of power.” In 2009 she signed directly with her Russian colleague Mr. Vladimir Putin contracts for the supply of gas, causing around 130 million euros in damages to the national Treasury, say the investigators. The hot climate, not only for the temperature, will not help the judges.
 If convicted the former Ukrainian “Joan of Arc” could face up to 10 years in prison. The European Union and the United States have sent their observers. There are already numerous dossiers on members of the former government and former Interior Minister Yuri Lutsenko was arrested for “embezzlement”. Parties close to Ms. Tymoshenko accused the Russophone archenemy President Viktor Janukovich of wanting to turn himself into a dictator and former prime minister has asked the European Court of Human Rights to rule, since the charges were politically motivated. “This is just a farce,” she went down hard early in the process. This is a revenge of the “coward” Yanukovich against her.
 The definition of the price of gas has always been problematic. There are many factors that contribute to shape it in a little transparency. Since the collapse of the USSR Ukrainians and Russians have been constantly on stormy relationship, going so far as to fight two “wars”. Pipelines were blocked twice in 2006 and in 2009 and Europe was left frozen in winter.
 President Yanukovich assured Western capitals that justice and politics are well separated in his country. In an interview with a French newspaper the Ukrainian leader said that the price set in 2009 was “unfair.” Kiev accepted to pay $ 450 per thousand cubic meters, when at the free market it was 179. “Today – asserted Yanukovich – should be less than $ 200.”


 How to prevent future threats to the Baltic region was the main topic at the Estonian – Lithuanian summit, held in Tartu. The two states seek to become NATO’s energy and cyber security hubs not forgetting a recent period of tension with Russia.
 Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves assured the support of his country in developing the energy security centre in Lithuania into a NATO Centre of Excellence, as the alliance’s cyber defence centre in Tallinn. His Lithuanian colleague Dalia Grybauskaite highlighted that both countries are united by the common goal of preventing the use of energy as a political tool. It is therefore necessary to speed up the integration of the Baltic States’ electricity market into the Nordic market (NordPool), to diversify energy supplies and to reduce dependence on a single supplier.
Mrs. Grybauskaite said that his country supported the construction of a LNG terminal in Estonia or in Latvia, but it had decided to build its own terminal in Klaipeda. She pointed out that several terminals operating in the Baltic countries would increase competition in the gas market, ensure  lower consumer prices and strengthen the region’s energy independence.
 “Estonia is still interested in participation in the Visaginas nuclear power station,” President Ilves assured, adding that Eesti Energia is currently considering the offers of two potential investors. “Let us hope that the negotiations for finding and involving a strategic investor will be successful and the new nuclear power station will be a project that will really enhance the energy security and independence of the region considerably.”
 Speaking about cyber security, Mrs. Grybauskaite proposed to follow the recommendations of the former foreign minister of Norway, Jens Stoltenberg, and to form a Nordic-Baltic cyber defence force.
 For a further European integration Mr. Ilves said that “When can we take a high-speed train from Estonia, through Latvia and Lithuania, to Berlin? When will we finally have a modern Via Baltica, which connects all of us and then runs further, to Poland? When will the Baltic states no longer be an energy isle, separated from the rest of Europe? The answers to these questions will also represent our evaluation of the health of our regional co-operation in the 21st century.”
Presidents Ilves and Grybauskaite discussed the neighbourhood policies of the European Union, with an emphasis on Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova and Belarus.
“The government in Minsk, which talks to its people in the language of batons and imprisonment, is not fit to be a part of today’s Europe. In this case, the European Union should use powerful words to provide balance, by uniting its voice with its mind; the pressure on the Belarusian regime needs to be powerful and efficient, with all sanctions very accurately aimed,” President Ilves added.

Travel to the Baltic Hansa, book by Giuseppe D’Amato.

 


The European Union and Russia are not only neighbours but also strategic partners.  At the upcoming 27th summit, in Nizhny Novgorod, the EU will be represented by Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council and by José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission. Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and Karel De Gucht, Commissioner for Trade, will also take part. Russia will be represented by Dmitry Medvedev, President of Russia. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Minister of Economic Development Nabiullina will also participate. The summit will take place over two days, beginning with an informal dinner on 9 June and continuing with a plenary session on the morning of 10 June, followed by a working lunch and a press conference.
The parties are expected to discuss the following issues:

• the global economy and global governance issues;

• EU-Russia relations, in particular the EU-Russia Partnership for Modernisation;

• international issues, including the developments in North Africa and the Middle East.

The Summit will on build on the good results achieved at last year’s EU Russia Summits, held in Rostov and Brussels.

The EU and Russia will take note of the good progress made in the implementation of the EURussia Partnership for Modernisation, which is a key initiative providing additional momentum to ongoing work in the Dialogues under our Common Spaces. The EU and Russia will discuss the state of play in the negotiations on Russia’s accession to the WTO, which are now at multilateral level. The new EU-Russia Agreement, which is currently being negotiated, should provide a solid basis for deepened bilateral relations in the 21st century covering all areas of EU-Russia relations.

A growing economic relationship
Economic ties between Russia and the EU have grown substantially over the last years. Russia remains the EU’s third most important trading partner in goods (after the US and China), with 87 billion EUR in exports to Russia (6.4% of all EU exports, 4th place after US, China, Switzerland) and 155 billion EUR in imports in 2010 (10.4 % of all EU imports, 3rd place after China and US, mostly natural resources). The EU is thus by far the largest market for Russian goods. 
In 2010, both imports and exports rose by approximately 32 % compared to 2009, after having been hit by the global economic crisis. Russia enjoyed a trade surplus of 68 billion EUR with the EU. Russia’s total account surplus rose by 47% compared to 2009 and reached $ 79 billion in 2010.  More specifically, Russia is the EU’s most important single supplier of energy products, accounting for over 25% of the EU consumption of oil and gas. In turn, Russia’s economy remains highly dependent on the export of energy raw materials, with the EU as its most 2 important destination. In 2010 63% of Russia’s exports consisted of crude oil, oil products and natural gas. The EU accounts for 88% of Russia’s total oil exports, 70% of its gas exports and 50% of its coal exports.

Financial cooperation
Financial cooperation with Russia began in the early 1990s, under the TACIS program, which has in the meantime been replaced by the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument. To help smooth Russia’s transition, a whole range of sectors were supported. Since 1991, a total of around €2.8 billion of assistance was provided through the European Commission. A number of TACIS projects are still being implemented until 2013. Given the significant recent improvements in the Russian Federation’s fiscal position, the need for large volumes of financial assistance has declined. In fact, Russia herself has become a donor. Financial cooperation is now specifically targeted to meet the objectives defined in the road-maps to the EU-Russia Common Spaces. Cooperation is now carried out on the principle of co-financing by the EU and Russia. Most notably, Russia is co-financing Cross Border Cooperation programmes. Emphasis is on higher education cooperation, with Erasmus Mundus and Tempus supporting mobility of students and teaching staff. 
 Furthermore, funding for Russia also came from the Nuclear Safety Instrument (€500 million since 1991) and a number of other thematic programs. The European Democracy and Human Rights Instrument (EIDHR) financed 14 human rights projects in Russia in 2010 for nearly € 2 million, and the Institution Building Partnership Programme supported 16 projects with NGOs for a total of € 5 million.

EU-Russia relations – background
The legal basis for EU relations with Russia is the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) which came into force on 1 December 1997 for an initial duration of 10 years, and which has been automatically extended beyond 2007 on an annual basis. It sets the principal common objectives, establishes the institutional framework for bilateral contacts, and calls for activities and dialogue in a number of areas. The EU is currently working with Russia on a new agreement to replace the PCA. Both the EU and Russia have experienced many political, economic and social changes since the entry into force of the PCA in 1997. The new agreement must reflect these changes as well as the new challenges linked to the globalised world in which we are living.  At the St. Petersburg Summit in May 2003, the EU and Russia agreed to reinforce their cooperation by creating four “common spaces”:

• the Common Economic Space aiming to make the EU and Russia’s economies more compatible to help boost investment and trade;

• the Common Space on Freedom, Security and Justice covering the area also known as Justice and Home Affairs;

• the Common Space on External Security aiming to enhance cooperation on foreign policy and security issues; and

• the Common Space on Research, Education and Culture aiming to promote scientific, educational and cultural cooperation.

Materials from the site of the European Delegation to Russia.


“Around two out of three Poles think preparations for the Euro 2012 football championships are not going well and three out of four are pessimistic about the national team’s chances at the finals, finds a new poll.
The survey by Homo Homini, commissioned by Polish Radio found that 60 percent of respondents think that construction work in Warsaw, Gdansk and other cities hosting the event are proceeding poorly, with 22 percent thinking preparations are going well, while 18 percent have no opinion on the issue.
As regards preparations by the national team, led by coach Franciszek Smuda, 75 percent of Poles are not expecting success at the finals.
The poll was taken, however, before Poland’s 2-1 win over Argentina in Warsaw on Sunday, with goals from Adrian Mierzejewski and Pawel Brozek for the home side and Marco Ruben for the visitors.
Though a good result for Poland, Argentina put out a second-string 11 without stars such as Lionel Messi, Javier Mascherano, Javier Pastore, Carlos Tevez and Gonzalo Higuain.
Poland’s final game of the season comes against France on Thursday, which was meant to take place at the PGE Gdansk stadium in the north – but due to incomplete preparations it has had to be moved to Legia Warszawa’s venue in the capital.

Government optimistic
Sports Minister Adam Giersz, however, has said he is confident that everything will be ready for the finals next summer.
“The venues will be up and running well ahead of the first whistle,” he told Polish Radio. “Construction should be ready a year before the event although there may be slight delays with the National Stadium in Warsaw and maybe with the one in Wroclaw [western Poland],” the sports minister added. He argued that many previous host countries reported delays in their preparations and yet the tournaments took place as scheduled.“The construction of the stadium in South Africa was completed only a month before the [2010] World Cup,” said Giersz.
Marcin Herra, head of PL2012, the company supervising the preparation process, says that 70 of the construction work is being carried out according to the schedule. The remaining 30 percent has caused some delays to road and railway construction, including the renovation of the central train stations in Warsaw and Poznan”.

Source
- Polskie Radio
.


From EuroNews

The arrest of Ratko Mladic is certainly a major step towards a faster integration of Serbia within the EU. His detention has also closed a bloody chapter in the former Yugoslav history, bringing the region closer to reconciliation.
 The full co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) is the main pre-condition for the negotiations with Brussels. The EU signed a so-called Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) – including an interim deal aiming to facilitate economic and trade relations – with Serbia in April 2008, but then decided to freeze it under Dutch pressure. Only in December 2009 the Netherlands put aside objections related to Belgrade’s performance on war crimes probes.
 General Mladic led the militia of the breakaway Republica Srbska, which sought to impose a Serbian identity on the multi-ethnic state of Bosnia; he was the architect of ethnic-cleansing schemes that included the Siege of Sarajevo and the 1995 Srebrenica Massacre in which about 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men were systematically executed. He was indicted by the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague in 1995 for genocide and other crimes.
 The hunt for Mladic started already at the end of 1995. Many observers in Serbia and in the EU suspect that the general has been protected for years by Serbian security forces loyal to President Slobodan Milosevic, who was ousted from power in October 2000.  Mladic’s former political master Radovan Karadzic was arrested in 2008 and is still in The Hague.
  By the end of the year, after so long negotiations, Serbia will have the chance of formally becoming an EU membership candidate and getting a starting date for accession talks. Serbian President Tadic rejected criticism that Belgrade had only taken action following international pressure and had not calculated when to arrest Mladic, who is considered a hero by local nationalists. But there are still too many unanswered questions.
 The European integration of Serbia, Bosnia, and Kosovo is the promise in exchange for concessions to old enemies and the achievement of a complete stable peace in the region. The problem is, however, to understand whether the 27 are ready to accept new members, who have such big open questions in their recent history.
Giuseppe D’Amato


The Polish Constitution of May 3, 1791, was the first Fundamental Law adopted in Europe and the second world’s Constitution after that of the United States in 1787. The document was a secret project and its final version was drafted among others by the politician and thinker Hugo Kołłątaj.
The Sejm session which led to the adoption of the Constitution was held in an atmosphere of a coup d’état. Many deputies came to the Royal Castle in Warsaw, where the session was taking place, in secrecy and the castle was guarded by numerous troops. After a heated, but short debate, the Fundamental Law was adopted with a majority of votes.

Chamber of Senate at the Royal Castle in Warsaw – wikipedia.org

The Constitution of 1791 comprised 11 articles. It introduced the principle of independence for the nobility and townspeople and the separation of powers between the Legislature (a bicameral Sejm), the Executive and the Judiciary branches.
Peasants came under the protection of the law and government. This was the first step toward the ending of serfdom. The Constitution provided for “ordinary” meetings of the Sejm once in two years and special sessions when required by national emergency. The Lower Chamber, called the Chamber of Deputies, was made up of 204 deputies and plenipotentiaries of 24 royal cities. The Upper Chamber of Senators comprised 132 senators, including province governors, castellans, government ministers and bishops. The Constitution abolished the liberum veto.
The Executive power was in the hands of a royal Council, known as the Guardians of the Laws. This Council was presided over by the King and included five ministers appointed by him: the minister of police, the minister of the seal (internal affairs), the minister of the seal of foreign affairs, the minister of war, and the minister of the Treasury. The decrees issued by the King required countersignature by a minister.
To enhance the unity and security of the Commonwealth, the Fundamental Law abolished the Union of Poland and Lithuania in favour of a unitary State. This decision was the end of the Union of the Crown of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which had been established in 1569. The Constitution changed the free royal election system to a dynastic elected monarchy, which was meant to reduce the influence of foreign powers in royal elections.
The Constitution acknowledged the Roman Catholic faith as the dominant religion, but at the same time it guaranteed freedom to all religions.
The Constitution of May 3rd remained an unfinished work. It was in effect for only one year before Poland lost its independency. The last attempt at preserving the its legacy was the insurrection led by Tadeusz Kościuszko. In 1794, in Cracow, he issued the unprecedented “Proclamation of Połaniec,” granting freedom and ownership of land to peasants who fought in the insurrection. The insurgents had some initial victories, but then the armies of Russia, Austria and Prussia launched a military crackdown. The defeat of Kościuszko’s forces led in 1795 to the third and final partition of Poland.
May 3rd was restored as an official Polish holiday in April 1990, after the fall of communism. In 2007, May 3rd was in addition declared a Lithuanian national holiday. The first joint celebration by the Polish Sejm and the Lithuanian Seimas took place on May 3rd, 2007


  Poland highlights the European “hypocrisy” in Northern Africa. This is one of the main reasons behind Warsaw’s decision not to participate in NATO’s military operations in Libya, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told Gazeta Wyborcza. According to him, Europe risks creating the impression it only intervene when oil supplies are at stake.
 ”Although there exists a need to defend civilians from a regime’s brutality, isn’t the Libyan case yet another example of European hypocrisy in view of the way Europe has behaved towards Gaddafi in recent years or even months?” said Mr. Tusk. He also added: “If we want to defend people against dictators and repression, torture or imprisonment, then this rule must be universal.” 
  In future Poland, a usually staunch NATO ally that sent soldiers to Iraq and still has 2,600 troops in Afghanistan,  “will take decisions on military involvement elsewhere only when” there’s “a 100 percent conviction that it is absolutely necessary,” explained Mr. Tusk. 
  Warsaw that assumes the European Union’s rotating six-month presidency in July is also a close ally to the United States. President Obama decided to withdraw its military after the first days of the intervention. Poland has no national interests in Libya and faces parliamentary elections in autumn.  The current war has shown that the EU does not have a common foreign policy that it is still in the hands of the states. French president Sarkozy and British Prime minister Cameron’s initiative in Africa has provoked divisions in the 27-nation bloc. 
 Poland is the biggest beneficiary of the regional EU aids. Talks on the EU’s next multi-year budget are set to begin later this year under the Polish presidency. At that time it would be important not to forget other types of “hypocrisy”.


In his speech to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the abolition of serfdom, President Dmitry Medvedev drew parallels between Tsar Alexander II’s reforms and the modernisation drive his currently engaged in. “In essence we are continuing a political course that was set 150 years ago.”  

 Medvedev told an audience in St. Petersburg’s Mariinsky Palace. “Freedom cannot be put off another day.” “After 150 years, the feeling of serfdom remains in much of our consciousness. Even when we discuss questions important for society we get scared of taking decisions because this feeling of serfdom sits deep inside us,” said the deputy head of the ruling council of United Russia, Yury Shuvalov, to the Interfax news agency.

 Alexander II`s March 3, 1861 decree to end centuries of feudal ownership of peasants by landlords was accompanied by other major reforms like the creation of elected local councils and improvements in the legal system. “This was not the Soviet experiment but a project of normal, humane development, initiated by Alexander II,” Medvedev said. “From the historic point of view, it was he who was proved right. Not Nicholas I, not Stalin,” Medvedev added.

 The “liberal” reform of Alexander II’s early years in power was followed by nearly half a century of reaction, as his two imperial successors failed to develop the country economically or socially beyond the level of a backward country. Many historians also believe creation of an urban working class from the emancipation and loosening of political controls by Alexander was a direct cause of the Russian Revolution that ended imperial rule.

Article – Reuters


 “Russia has revealed details of its ambitious plan to upgrade its army over the next ten years, planning to spend US$ 650 billion.
 First and foremost, Russian defense will focus on the development of strategic nuclear weapons, construction of over 100 military vessels for Russian Navy, including construction of four originally French-made Mistral-class amphibious assault ships, and the introduction into the Air Force of over 1,000 helicopters and 600 military planes, including fifth generation PAK-FA fighter.
Most of the military hardware will be equipped with next-generation weaponry.
 For the first time ever, Russia is planning to buy military equipment from NATO-member countries – two Mistral helicopter carriers will be bought in France (with two more licensed to be built in Russia), as well as samples of armored vehicles from Italy and elements of personal combat systems also from France.
 Moscow’s plans to modernize Russian strategic nuclear forces do not contravene the newly-signed New START nuclear arms reduction treaty with the US, which aims at the reduction of up to a third of the strategic nuclear weapons in both Russia and the US”.

 Russia Today – February 25th, 2011.

If the renewal is a success, it will leave Russia less reliant on the nuclear arsenal it inherited from the USSR. “Russia needs a professional non-commissioned officer corps to train specialists who can really put these arms to effective use,” Pavel Felgenhauer, an independent military analyst, told AP. “This spending necessitates a whole new kind of military.”

On the same topic:

Article 1. Associated Press —-Article 2. Ria Novosti July 2010.


Welcome

We are a group of long experienced European journalists and intellectuals interested in international politics and culture. We would like to exchange our opinion on new Europe and Russia.

Rossosch – Medio Don



            SCHOLL