Tusk contro Kaczynski. Il liberale contro l’ultra conservatore. Il moderno filo-occidentale, attualmente leader semestrale di turno dell’Unione europea, contro l’euroscettico, che critica pesantemente i nemici storici tedeschi e russi.
I polacchi, che appaiono sempre più divisi tra coloro che godono del boom economico di questi anni e chi invece si è ulteriormente impoverito, scelgono tra due visioni opposte. Non è un caso che il premier Donald Tusk abbia chiuso la sua campagna elettorale incontrando a Varsavia migliaia di ragazzi nel rinnovato stadio nazionale, simbolo della Polonia post comunista e fiore all’occhiello di Euro 2012. Jaroslaw Kaczynski, al contrario, ha preferito partecipare ad un pranzo tradizionale in provincia, ospite di una semplice famiglia. Città contro campagne, dunque. Giovani contro generazioni più mature.
Venerdì sera colpiva il visitatore straniero osservare il contrasto tra una decina di anziani con le candele in mano raccolti in preghiera davanti al palazzo presidenziale in ricordo dei morti della tragedia aerea di Smolensk dell’aprile 2010, mentre tutto intorno bar e ristoranti, pieni all’inverosimile di persone mezze ubriache appartenenti alla classe media, sparavano musica a tutto volume.
In queste tese settimane Tusk ha parlato di economia, di riforma delle pensioni, di controllo del deficit di bilancio e del debito (addirittura il 55% del Pil!). Il Paese, che sta gestendo le trattative per il bilancio continentale UE 2014-2020, è prossimo a nuove privatizzazioni ed alla costruzione di altre infrastrutture, finanziate sempre con i fondi europei (67 miliardi di euro nel precedente bilancio UE, forse 81 nel prossimo). Durante il suo premierato gli stipendi medi sono aumentati del 18%, la Polonia cresce da un decennio al ritmo del 3% ed è l’unico Stato Ue a non essere caduto in recessione nel 2009.
Jaroslaw Kaczynski, che non ha perso la sua bellicosità dopo la tragica morte del fratello-gemello presidente Lech a Smolensk, ha ribattuto punto su punto, aiutato dai candidati del suo partito Legge e Giustizia. Non ha, però, mancato di risvegliare i vecchi fantasmi, affermando che la Merkel è diventata cancelliera anche grazie alla Stasi, i servizi segreti della DDR.
L’ago della bilancia della partita potrebbero essere gli altri contendenti. Solo 5 formazioni – affermano sondaggi contrastanti – dovrebbero superare la barriera del 5%, per avere una rappresentanza parlamentare. Molto dipenderà dal tasso di affluenza alle urne e dalla performance di PSL, alleato di coalizione di Piattaforma civica di Tusk, mentre sorprende la forza della Lista “anticlericale” di Janusz Palikot a scapito dei socialdemocratici di SLD.
Se Piattaforma civica vincerà sarà il primo partito dal 1989 ad ottenere due mandati consecutivi. La paura della classe media nazionale e della Commissione europea è, però, che inizi un periodo di instabilità politica anche in Polonia. Un altro mal di pancia per Barroso e company non ci vorrebbe proprio!
Giuseppe D’Amato
“Thousands of minority Poles on Friday protested a new law in Lithuania that they claim discriminates against them and could diminish their education by demanding greater knowledge of the Lithuanian language.
The protests outside Parliament in the capital Vilnius underscored the contentious issue of language rights in Lithuania, a subject that has been the cause of tension in its relations with Poland.
Ethnic Poles number about 200,000 of Lithuania’s 3 million citizens, mainly the result of shifting borders after World War II. Many of these Poles speak Polish at home and attend Polish-language schools. But the law, which passed in March and took effect in July, introduces standardized Lithuanian exams for all upper-class students, which minorities believe will put them at a disadvantage vis-a-vis native speakers….
Waldemar Tomaszewski, a member of the European Parliament from Lithuania, said the government should “postpone this law until 2018 or maintain the right for students of ethnic minorities to pass exams in their native language.”
Over the past year, the language issue has led nationalist politicians in Poland and Lithuania to trade barbed criticism. Lithuania’s Polish residents are upset that they cannot spell their name in legal documents with the letter ‘w‘ _ a prominent letter in Polish that doesn’t exist in the Lithuanian alphabet…”
Full Article – Associated Press – Taiwan News
“Lithuania seems to start realizing the projects leading toward energy security and reduction of dependence on one supplier (Russia). These projects (energy connections with Poland and Sweden, a planned gas pipeline between Lithuania and Poland etc.) will be realized with the EU assistance as part of the Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan (BEMIP).
This EU plan can be divided into two parts: development of the electricity sector and development of the gas sector. The latter is relevant in considering the construction of liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals in the eastern Baltic Sea region. Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland are still isolated from the integrated EU gas supply system. According to BEMIP these states are referred to as a single segment, therefore one of the key goals is their integration into the EU gas supply system.
All three Baltic States declared their willingness to construct LNG terminals. Lithuania is determined to build a small-size terminal independently, i.e. without the EU’s financial assistance. Its capacity could be 2-3 billion cubic meters of gas per year (primarily for the internal use). The so-called Kiaules Nugara (Pig’s back) island in the Kursiu Lagoon (close to Klaipeda) has been chosen for the construction of the terminal. Lithuania has selected the US company “FluorInternational” as lead adviser for preparation and implementation of the project….more”
Article – Rimvydas Ragauskas – Geopolitika
Giuseppe D’Amato Travel to the Baltic Hansa, Greco&Greco, Milano, 2004.
Primo luglio 2011. La Polonia è in festa. Il Paese dalla “tanta storia e poca geografia” ha assunto per la prima volta la presidenza dell’Unione Europea, completando quel durissimo percorso iniziato subito dopo l’uscita dalla sfera di influenza sovietica alla fine della Guerra Fredda. 
La Polonia è oggi un esempio di democrazia normale e moderna con un’economia solida e dinamica. Ma non sono state tutte rose e fiori per ottenere questo risultato. Il referendum di adesione all’Ue, con la discesa in campo persino di Papa Wojtyla, fu vinto a fatica nel giugno 2003. Quanta la paura dell’ennesimo scherzo della storia! Ricordiamo ancora le lacrime della gente, quando, nella notte del primo maggio 2004, la bandiera europea salì nel cielo di Varsavia a piazza Pilsudski, mentre il mattino successivo il centro cittadino fu paralizzato dalla protesta di migliaia di euroscettici. Le successive elezioni dell’autunno 2005 furono vinte dai gemelli Kaczynski alla testa di un partito che radunava scontenti ed ultra-conservatori.
I pesanti costi sociali per l’adesione all’Ue sono stati mitigati dai fondi strutturali (67 miliardi dal 2007 al 2013), giusta compensazione dell’Occidente per aver abbandonato la Polonia per quattro decenni nelle mani dei sovietici. Il boom economico, aiutato dai forti investimenti stranieri – soprattutto d’oltreoceano -, ha fatto il resto. Le città si sono arricchite tanto che si fa fatica a riconoscerle rispetto a come erano all’inizio del secolo. Finalmente i polacchi sono diventati fiduciosi nell’Unione. In un sondaggio gli euroentusiasti sono vicini all’80%.
Nella sua qualità di presidente dell’Ue la Polonia gestirà la complessa trattativa per la definizione del budget continentale 2014-2021. La Commissione europea le ha già garantito ben 80 miliardi di euro di nuovi fondi strutturali sui 972,2 del bilancio totale continentale. Varsavia intende aprire la strada all’Associazione all’Ue dell’Ucraina, Paese vicino col quale ospiterà la tanto attesa vetrina degli Europei di calcio nel prossimo giugno 2012, concludere i negoziati con la Croazia e migliorare ulteriormente i rapporti con la Russia.
In Europa ci sono anche esempi positivi non solo la Grecia o i PIGS o l’Italia che balbetta da un decennio. L’economia di Varsavia viaggia a tassi di espansione “alla tedesca”. Ecco perché la Polonia di Donald Tusk si candida a diventare una “Spagna”, ma dalle fondamenta salde, di questo decennio.
Giuseppe D’Amato

Logo
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk presented information in Parliament concerning the priorities of the Polish Presidency, which will commence on 1 July this year. The Prime Minister emphasised that during the Presidency the government wants not just to maintain but to increase Poland’s status as a responsible and highly valued state.
“It is expected that the Presidency will allow us to jointly create political leadership which does not consist of taking routine decisions but which may help the EU as a whole,” he said. “It is of paramount importance that during the Presidency we can maintain and increase Poland’s status as a country which is highly valued in internal EU debates and which demonstrates a high level of responsibility with regard to the EU’s foreign relations,” he underlined, adding that Poland will also want to maintain and increase its status as a responsible country in dealing with economic and financial issues.
The Prime Minister stressed that Poland has developed its image as a state which is capable of being a new driving force in the European Union. “Today Poland is treated as one of the leaders – of which unfortunately there are few in the EU – which strive to force through issues of EU-wide significance,” stated the Prime Minister. In his view, from the beginning of the economic crisis Poland constantly came out against the revival of state control and nationalism which was visible in the actions and statements of some politicians and EU Member States.
Mr Tusk drew attention to the fact that it is important for good political initiatives to emerge during the Polish Presidency. “We have a significant interest in Poland’s Presidency being remembered by Europeans through issues including the finalising of long-term processes,” he said. “It is possible that during the Polish Presidency we will see the completion of negotiations with Croatia, which would mean that the accession treaty will be signed during the Presidency,” stated the Prime Minister. He added that completion of negotiations with Ukraine on an association agreement and agreement on free trade is also realistic. “This would be the first successful step in the process of bringing Ukraine closer to Europe,” the Prime Minister stated.
Full article - Polish Presidency of the EU.
How to prevent future threats to the Baltic region was the main topic at the Estonian – Lithuanian summit, held in Tartu. The two states seek to become NATO’s energy and cyber security hubs not forgetting a recent period of tension with Russia.
Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves assured the support of his country in developing the energy security centre in Lithuania into a NATO Centre of Excellence, as the alliance’s cyber defence centre in Tallinn. His Lithuanian colleague Dalia Grybauskaite highlighted that both countries are united by the common goal of preventing the use of energy as a political tool. It is therefore necessary to speed up the integration of the Baltic States’ electricity market into the Nordic market (NordPool), to diversify energy supplies and to reduce dependence on a single supplier.
Mrs. Grybauskaite said that his country supported the construction of a LNG terminal in Estonia or in Latvia, but it had decided to build its own terminal in Klaipeda. She pointed out that several terminals operating in the Baltic countries would increase competition in the gas market, ensure lower consumer prices and strengthen the region’s energy independence.
“Estonia is still interested in participation in the Visaginas nuclear power station,” President Ilves assured, adding that Eesti Energia is currently considering the offers of two potential investors. “Let us hope that the negotiations for finding and involving a strategic investor will be successful and the new nuclear power station will be a project that will really enhance the energy security and independence of the region considerably.”
Speaking about cyber security, Mrs. Grybauskaite proposed to follow the recommendations of the former foreign minister of Norway, Jens Stoltenberg, and to form a Nordic-Baltic cyber defence force.
For a further European integration Mr. Ilves said that “When can we take a high-speed train from Estonia, through Latvia and Lithuania, to Berlin? When will we finally have a modern Via Baltica, which connects all of us and then runs further, to Poland? When will the Baltic states no longer be an energy isle, separated from the rest of Europe? The answers to these questions will also represent our evaluation of the health of our regional co-operation in the 21st century.”
Presidents Ilves and Grybauskaite discussed the neighbourhood policies of the European Union, with an emphasis on Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova and Belarus.
“The government in Minsk, which talks to its people in the language of batons and imprisonment, is not fit to be a part of today’s Europe. In this case, the European Union should use powerful words to provide balance, by uniting its voice with its mind; the pressure on the Belarusian regime needs to be powerful and efficient, with all sanctions very accurately aimed,” President Ilves added.
Travel to the Baltic Hansa, book by Giuseppe D’Amato.
The European Union and Russia are not only neighbours but also strategic partners. At the upcoming 27th summit, in Nizhny Novgorod, the EU will be represented by Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Council and by José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission. Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and Karel De Gucht, Commissioner for Trade, will also take part. Russia will be represented by Dmitry Medvedev, President of Russia. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Minister of Economic Development Nabiullina will also participate. The summit will take place over two days, beginning with an informal dinner on 9 June and continuing with a plenary session on the morning of 10 June, followed by a working lunch and a press conference. 
The parties are expected to discuss the following issues:
the global economy and global governance issues;
EU-Russia relations, in particular the EU-Russia Partnership for Modernisation;
international issues, including the developments in North Africa and the Middle East.
The Summit will on build on the good results achieved at last year’s EU Russia Summits, held in Rostov and Brussels.
The EU and Russia will take note of the good progress made in the implementation of the EURussia Partnership for Modernisation, which is a key initiative providing additional momentum to ongoing work in the Dialogues under our Common Spaces. The EU and Russia will discuss the state of play in the negotiations on Russia’s accession to the WTO, which are now at multilateral level. The new EU-Russia Agreement, which is currently being negotiated, should provide a solid basis for deepened bilateral relations in the 21st century covering all areas of EU-Russia relations.
A growing economic relationship
Economic ties between Russia and the EU have grown substantially over the last years. Russia remains the EU’s third most important trading partner in goods (after the US and China), with 87 billion EUR in exports to Russia (6.4% of all EU exports, 4th place after US, China, Switzerland) and 155 billion EUR in imports in 2010 (10.4 % of all EU imports, 3rd place after China and US, mostly natural resources). The EU is thus by far the largest market for Russian goods.
In 2010, both imports and exports rose by approximately 32 % compared to 2009, after having been hit by the global economic crisis. Russia enjoyed a trade surplus of 68 billion EUR with the EU. Russia’s total account surplus rose by 47% compared to 2009 and reached $ 79 billion in 2010. More specifically, Russia is the EU’s most important single supplier of energy products, accounting for over 25% of the EU consumption of oil and gas. In turn, Russia’s economy remains highly dependent on the export of energy raw materials, with the EU as its most 2 important destination. In 2010 63% of Russia’s exports consisted of crude oil, oil products and natural gas. The EU accounts for 88% of Russia’s total oil exports, 70% of its gas exports and 50% of its coal exports.
Financial cooperation
Financial cooperation with Russia began in the early 1990s, under the TACIS program, which has in the meantime been replaced by the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument. To help smooth Russia’s transition, a whole range of sectors were supported. Since 1991, a total of around €2.8 billion of assistance was provided through the European Commission. A number of TACIS projects are still being implemented until 2013. Given the significant recent improvements in the Russian Federation’s fiscal position, the need for large volumes of financial assistance has declined. In fact, Russia herself has become a donor. Financial cooperation is now specifically targeted to meet the objectives defined in the road-maps to the EU-Russia Common Spaces. Cooperation is now carried out on the principle of co-financing by the EU and Russia. Most notably, Russia is co-financing Cross Border Cooperation programmes. Emphasis is on higher education cooperation, with Erasmus Mundus and Tempus supporting mobility of students and teaching staff.
Furthermore, funding for Russia also came from the Nuclear Safety Instrument (€500 million since 1991) and a number of other thematic programs. The European Democracy and Human Rights Instrument (EIDHR) financed 14 human rights projects in Russia in 2010 for nearly € 2 million, and the Institution Building Partnership Programme supported 16 projects with NGOs for a total of € 5 million.
EU-Russia relations – background
The legal basis for EU relations with Russia is the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) which came into force on 1 December 1997 for an initial duration of 10 years, and which has been automatically extended beyond 2007 on an annual basis. It sets the principal common objectives, establishes the institutional framework for bilateral contacts, and calls for activities and dialogue in a number of areas. The EU is currently working with Russia on a new agreement to replace the PCA. Both the EU and Russia have experienced many political, economic and social changes since the entry into force of the PCA in 1997. The new agreement must reflect these changes as well as the new challenges linked to the globalised world in which we are living. At the St. Petersburg Summit in May 2003, the EU and Russia agreed to reinforce their cooperation by creating four “common spaces”:
the Common Economic Space aiming to make the EU and Russia’s economies more compatible to help boost investment and trade;
the Common Space on Freedom, Security and Justice covering the area also known as Justice and Home Affairs;
the Common Space on External Security aiming to enhance cooperation on foreign policy and security issues; and
the Common Space on Research, Education and Culture aiming to promote scientific, educational and cultural cooperation.
Materials from the site of the European Delegation to Russia.
«Если бы мы не жили в глобализированном мире в эпоху Интернета, электронных паспортов и мобильных телефонов, этому еще было бы какое-то оправдание…. Виза — это рудиментарное средство, созданное, чтобы контролировать передвижения людей и не пускать криминальных лиц, как будто мафиозные элементы обращаются в консульства в надежде получить разрешения на свои спецтуры. Тот же самый разговор шпионов…
Несмотря на то что после распада СССР самое популярное слово в России стало “почём”, никто себе всерьез не задавал вопроса, сколько стоит содержать эту средневековую систему виз и какой непосредственный ущерб она провоцирует… Вряд ли в России стоимость этой машины окупается… У европейцев есть преимущество: они разделяют общие расходы среди всех членов Шенгенского соглашения, то есть среди 25 стран….
Туристические страны, такие как Италия и Испания, выступают за отмену виз с Россией…
Интересно посмотреть на то, как другие страны решили проблемы, связанные с визами в ЕС. Украина является здесь хорошим примером. С 1 мая 2005 года для граждан Европейского союза, США, Японии, Канады и ряда других государств не нужна виза для посещения страны на срок до 90 дней. Решение было принято Киевом в одностороннем порядке. Ответные шаги Евросоюза пока заставляют себя ждать, но все надеются на сюрприз во время проведения чемпионата Европы по футболу 2012 года… В течение этих лет безвизового режима миллионы европейских туристов открыли для себя Украину, влюбились в красоту Киева, Львова, Одессы…
В преддверии Олимпиады в Сочи в 2014 году Россия пока наблюдает за шагами соседа, но скоро и ей придется принимать какие-то решения, как во время финала Лиги чемпионов 2008 года в Москве. Иначе вырастет риск фиаско, связанный с малым количеством иностранных зрителей в Сочи-2014…
Как известно, в Европе есть страны, которые выступают за отмену виз, но есть и другие, в которых русофобия — еще достаточно распространенное чувство. Каждое шенгенское государство должно дать свое согласие на то, чтобы изменить общие правила. После начала “арабских весен”, в январе, ЕС получил подтверждение тому, что миграционная волна с юга, из Африки, теперь опаснее, чем с востока, из бывшего соцлагеря. Отношения между Францией и Италией перенесли тяжелые испытания из-за десятка тысяч тунисских нелегалов. Некоторые члены Шенгенского соглашения снова начали контролировать свои границы… Ожидать в ближайшее время существенных изменений в этой средневековой системе контроля народов, увы, не стоит…
Конечно, вопрос виз имеет не только нерешенные технические проблемы, но и политические черты. Европа тщательно наблюдает за развитием российской демократии, которой в этом году исполняется уже 20 лет…
Учитывая приближение сочинской Олимпиады и чемпионата мира по футболу в России, время сейчас играет не на пользу вашей стране, которая никак не хочет поставить себя в то положение, когда самые дружественные ей европейские партнеры могли бы оказать свою помощь».
Статья Джузеппе Д’Амато Московский Комсомолец № 25661 от 7 июня 2011 г. Giuseppe D’Amato Moskovskij Komsomolets.

From EuroNews
The arrest of Ratko Mladic is certainly a major step towards a faster integration of Serbia within the EU. His detention has also closed a bloody chapter in the former Yugoslav history, bringing the region closer to reconciliation.
The full co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) is the main pre-condition for the negotiations with Brussels. The EU signed a so-called Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA) – including an interim deal aiming to facilitate economic and trade relations – with Serbia in April 2008, but then decided to freeze it under Dutch pressure. Only in December 2009 the Netherlands put aside objections related to Belgrade’s performance on war crimes probes.
General Mladic led the militia of the breakaway Republica Srbska, which sought to impose a Serbian identity on the multi-ethnic state of Bosnia; he was the architect of ethnic-cleansing schemes that included the Siege of Sarajevo and the 1995 Srebrenica Massacre in which about 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men were systematically executed. He was indicted by the UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague in 1995 for genocide and other crimes.
The hunt for Mladic started already at the end of 1995. Many observers in Serbia and in the EU suspect that the general has been protected for years by Serbian security forces loyal to President Slobodan Milosevic, who was ousted from power in October 2000. Mladic’s former political master Radovan Karadzic was arrested in 2008 and is still in The Hague.
By the end of the year, after so long negotiations, Serbia will have the chance of formally becoming an EU membership candidate and getting a starting date for accession talks. Serbian President Tadic rejected criticism that Belgrade had only taken action following international pressure and had not calculated when to arrest Mladic, who is considered a hero by local nationalists. But there are still too many unanswered questions.
The European integration of Serbia, Bosnia, and Kosovo is the promise in exchange for concessions to old enemies and the achievement of a complete stable peace in the region. The problem is, however, to understand whether the 27 are ready to accept new members, who have such big open questions in their recent history.
Giuseppe D’Amato
Poland highlights the European “hypocrisy” in Northern Africa. This is one of the main reasons behind Warsaw’s decision not to participate in NATO’s military operations in Libya, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk told Gazeta Wyborcza. According to him, Europe risks creating the impression it only intervene when oil supplies are at stake.
”Although there exists a need to defend civilians from a regime’s brutality, isn’t the Libyan case yet another example of European hypocrisy in view of the way Europe has behaved towards Gaddafi in recent years or even months?” said Mr. Tusk. He also added: “If we want to defend people against dictators and repression, torture or imprisonment, then this rule must be universal.”
In future Poland, a usually staunch NATO ally that sent soldiers to Iraq and still has 2,600 troops in Afghanistan, “will take decisions on military involvement elsewhere only when” there’s “a 100 percent conviction that it is absolutely necessary,” explained Mr. Tusk.
Warsaw that assumes the European Union’s rotating six-month presidency in July is also a close ally to the United States. President Obama decided to withdraw its military after the first days of the intervention. Poland has no national interests in Libya and faces parliamentary elections in autumn. The current war has shown that the EU does not have a common foreign policy that it is still in the hands of the states. French president Sarkozy and British Prime minister Cameron’s initiative in Africa has provoked divisions in the 27-nation bloc.
Poland is the biggest beneficiary of the regional EU aids. Talks on the EU’s next multi-year budget are set to begin later this year under the Polish presidency. At that time it would be important not to forget other types of “hypocrisy”.
We are a group of long experienced European journalists and intellectuals interested in international politics and culture. We would like to exchange our opinion on new Europe and Russia.