International Policy


 Il pugile ed il calciatore. Gli “eroi” nazionali, oggi divisi dalle elezioni legislative. Vitaly Klitschko ed Andriy Shevchenko sono i due volti nuovi della politica ucraina, da anni dominata – dopo l’eclisse del “padre” della “rivoluzione arancione” Viktor Jushenko – dallo scontro senza confini tra il presidente Viktor Janukovich e l’ex premier, ora in carcere, Julija Timoshenko.
  L’ex campione del mondo dei pesi massimi è il leader del partito Udar (ossia, colpo) ed è destinato a diventare il capo dell’opposizione. Se non farà errori probabilmente sarà lui ad essere il candidato da battere alle prossime presidenziali.
 L’ex capocannoniere di Milan e Chelsea è, invece, il “numero due” nella formazione “Avanti Ucraina!” di Nataliya Korolevskaya e se la sua compagine supererà la fatidica barriera del 5% per avere una rappresentanza in Parlamento Shevchenko diventerà deputato.
  Non è la prima volta che nell’ex Urss le “stelle” dello sport entrano in politica. Oleg Blokhin, bomber indimenticabile della grande Dinamo poi selezionatore della squadra nazionale agli ultimi Europei, è stato per ben due volte parlamentare tra le file dei social-democratici. Pochi giorni fa un altro ex calciatore, Kakha Kalaladze, già compagno di squadra di Shevchenko alla Dinamo Kiev ed al Milan, è stato addirittura nominato ministro dell’Energia e vice-premier nel nuovo governo georgiano.
  “Andiamo in Parlamento – ha picchiato duro Klitschko, con un passato da eletto nel Consiglio comunale di Kiev ed un forte impegno nel sociale, – non per cambiare i maiali, ma per togliere loro la mangiatoia!”
 Assai più diplomatico Shevchenko, che pare trovarsi non a proprio agio nel clima da rissa imperante da sempre sulla scena politica nazionale. “Vogliamo cambiare il Paese – ha spiegato l’ex bomber -. Il mio compito è costruire le infrastrutture”. Con Berlusconi Shevchenko si telefona, ma per ora non ha chiesto consigli.
  I due “eroi” ucraini in passato hanno collaborato per varie iniziative sociali, ma questa volta si sono praticamente ignorati. Anzi, Klitschko ha rifiutato di partecipare ad un incontro pubblico col calciatore per dibattere su giovani e sport. 
  La ragione della sua decisione è semplice. “Avanti Ucraina!”, formatasi da una costola fuoriuscita da “Patria”, la compagine della Timoshenko, rischia di fare il gioco della formazione di Janukovich, “il partito delle Regioni”, togliendo voti all’opposizione. I sondaggi sono chiarissimi. A fronte di un 24% di indecisi, i “blu” del presidente sono al 23%, Udar al 16, “Patria” al 15 ed i comunisti al 10. Solo l’8,8% degli ucraini crede che queste legislative saranno pulite. Migliaia sono gli osservatori presenti.
 Sia Unione europea che Russia guardano alla consultazione con interesse. L’Ucraina è ad un passo dalla firma di uno strategico patto di Associazione con Bruxelles ed è stata invitata allo stesso tempo da Mosca a far parte della nascente Unione doganale, una mini-Urss economica, simile alla CEE. Se il “giro di vite”, imposto al Paese da Janukovich, non è piaciuto agli occidentali Vladimir Putin spera adesso di riportare Kiev nella propria orbita.
  L’economia dell’ex repubblica sovietica, però, non va. Un prestito dell’Fmi è bloccato da anni e si rincorrono voci di una prossima svalutazione della grivnia.
  Questa volta Janukovich dovrà stare più attento. L’opposizione ha trovato un peso massimo e Klitschko si prepara già ai proverbiali corpo a corpo alla Rada, famosa in tutto il mondo per le più incredibili zuffe tra deputati.

Giuseppe D’Amato

 

 The parliamentary election in Ukraine will be “transparent and democratic,” President Victor Yanukovych has said. Following an example from Russia, Ukraine has installed webcams in all polling stations for maximal transparency.
The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) has sent 635 election observers to the country – more than ever before. In total, some 3,800 foreign observers monitor the vote. But only 8.8 percent of Ukrainians say the ballot will be fair, according to the Kiev-based Democratic Initiative Fund.
“The significant lack of political pluralism on television is very worrisome and requires immediate action,” EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton highlighted in a statement. The elections “will be a litmus test of Ukraine’s democratic credentials.”
The last time that Ukraine had a mixed election system – electing half of its 450 members of parliament in geographic districts, the other half through party lists – was 2002. Ten years ago, the opposition did well on the party lists, but failed to muster a majority after doing poorly in the single-mandate districts. Experts think that history will repeat itself.
The parliamentary vote marks the halfway point in Yanukovych’s first presidential term. Yanukovych’s approval rating is 12.6 percent, down from 37.8 percent in 2010, according to the Razumkov Center for Economic and Political Studies.
Polls suggest his party, the Party of Regions, will preserve its hold on the 450-seat legislature. The Party of Regions has 23.3 percent backing, compared with 16 percent for world boxing champion Vitaly Klitschko’s UDAR, 15.1 percent for Tymoshenko’s Fatherland and 10.1 percent for the Communists.
Control of Parliament will also be a major factor in the higher-stakes presidential contest in 2015. Vitali Klitschko the leader of the opposition UDAR party, seems to be a new future candidate with good chances to win. 
  Andriy Shevchenko, 36, a former AC Milan striker, runs for Ukraine Forward, which aims to pass parliament’s 5 percent entry barrier. That’s hurting opposition united under jailed ex-Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko and improving the prospects of Party of Regions.
The country has become increasingly isolated since Yanukovich’s election in a runoff with  Tymoshenko in 2010. And financial analysts say that the country’s economy is in trouble again as a result of flagging demand in Europe, particularly for steel, Ukraine’s main export.

«Холодные отношения с Западом, продолжительная ссора с Японией, потеря почти всех союзников в арабском мире. Остаются, конечно, Иран и Китай, но с партнерами из Поднебесной уже долгие годы невозможно заключить ключевого для российской экономики договора о приемлемых тарифах на газ…
На традиционный вопрос о том, куда идет Россия, в эти сложные месяцы получен однозначный ответ: к самоизоляции
Даже из Европы слышно, как нарастает громкость традиционной для России фразы: «Мы слишком большие, поэтому нас никто не любит!». …
не верьте пропагандистским бредням. Людей, которые ведут себя достойно, любят повсюду. Предрассудки и глупые клише в современном мире долго не живут. Историям о том, что зимой медведи гуляют по московским улицам, давно никто не верит. Но заморозки в отношениях с Россией, к сожалению, ощущаются. И очень не хочется думать, что нас снова ждет политическая зима».

 Статья – Джузеппе Д’Амато Московский Комсомолец № 26074 от 23 октября 2012 г. Giuseppe D’Amato Moskovskij Komsomolets.

 Il partito vicino al presidente Saakashvili ha clamorosamente perso le legislative. Troppe sono state nel recente passato le promesse mancate in campo socio-economico insieme alla macchia indelebile di aver scatenato nell’estate 2008 una disastrosa guerra, persa contro la Russia per riconquistare la provincia ribelle dell’Ossezia meridionale.
Non appena le litigiose opposizioni sono riuscite a trovare un vero leader i georgiani gli hanno accordato fiducia. La capitale Tbilisi ha votato compatta per il miliardario Ivanishvili, mentre la provincia solo in parte. Il 44enne Michail Saakashvili rischiava di diventare eccessivamente ingombrante non solo per la sua prestanza fisica.
Il 2013 è un anno cruciale per il Paese caucasico. L’eroe della “rivoluzione delle rose” concluderà il suo secondo ed ultimo mandato presidenziale (diventando ineleggibile) ed entrerà in vigore la nuova Costituzione che ridistribuisce i poteri. La Georgia si trasforma in repubblica parlamentare con il primo ministro ad avere prerogative quasi più importanti del capo dello Stato. Grande era, quindi, il pericolo che a Tbilisi andasse in onda una “mossa alla Putin” in cui un leader esce dalla porta principale e rientra dalla finestra.
Diciamolo subito: chi scrive non ha mai avuto simpatia per la “rivoluzione delle rose”, primo cambio di dirigenza pro-occidentale attraverso la piazza nello spazio ex sovietico nel 2003, in tutto simile all’analogo colpo di mano di Belgrado contro Milosevic del ‘99. Saakashivili andò al potere rovesciando il suo maestro e mentore, nonché padrino di suo figlio, Eduard Shevardnadze, uno dei pochi democratici della leadership sovietica che volle la fine della Guerra Fredda. L’uso sapiente dei nuovi mass media e l’appoggio giusto nelle cancellerie statunitense ed europee fecero passare l’ex ministro degli Esteri di Gorbaciov per “un dittatore”, un “dinosauro d’altri tempi”, dimenticando invece che era il garante di una precaria pace in un Paese sconvolto dalla guerra civile e dalle mafie.
Dopo aver litigato negli anni con tutti i suoi alleati politici Saakashvili ha ora perso gli appoggi in Occidente, che ha puntato su Ivanishvili ricevendo in cambio garanzie sul futuro transito delle materie prime dal mar Caspio fino ai ricchi mercati europei. Il miliardario continuerà la politica di avvicinamento a Bruxelles ed alla Nato, ma tenterà anche di riallacciare le secolari relazioni con la Russia, vicino accomunato da una comune storia e dalla fede ortodossa.
Garantire adesso un tranquillo passaggio di potere sarà il compito primario di Saakashvili, che dovrà una volta tanto mantenere le promesse e assicurarsi un’onorevole uscita di scena.
Sin dalla primavera 1989 i georgiani hanno lottato per la democrazia e sono stati un esempio nell’Urss. Ora paiono esserci riusciti: il tempo dei kalashnikov, dei brogli elettorali e dei golpe di piazza a Tbilisi è davvero finito.
Giuseppe D’Amato

 Intimidazioni, arresti di oppositori, litigi geopolitici. Ad ogni elezione in Bielorussia va in scena sempre lo stesso canovaccio. Non fanno eccezione le legislative di quest’anno.
Da martedì 18 settembre hanno già usufruito del voto anticipato ben il 20% degli aventi diritto. Secondo varie denunce le urne con le schede al loro interno rimarrebbero senza controllo e qualsiasi tipo di broglio sarebbe possibile.
Sono oltre trecento i candidati che si contendono i 110 seggi parlamentari. Dovranno vincere con la maggioranza assoluta nella propria circoscrizione e sperare che l’affluenza alle urne sia superiore del 50% degli aventi diritto. Altrimenti sarà necessario un secondo turno.
I candidati vicini al presidente Lukashenko sono destinati a far man bassa di mandati parlamentari. Le opposizioni hanno infatti ritirato i propri rappresentanti a pochi giorni dal voto. “Queste sono state la peggiore campagna elettorale e le peggiori legislative di sempre”, la loro giustificazione.
Dal 1996 Unione europea, Stati Uniti ed Osce non riconoscono la validità delle elezioni bielorusse, minate da palesi violazioni e lontanissime dagli standard internazionali.
Questa volta una missione dell’Osce, l’Organizzazione per la sicurezza e la cooperazione in Europa, è stata invitata a presenziare alle legislative. Ma a due suoi osservatori (un tedesco ed un lituano) non è stato inspiegabilmente concesso il visto di ingresso.
Ad inizio settimana alcuni giornalisti stranieri, che avevano partecipato ad un incontro organizzato dalle opposizioni, sono finiti dietro alle sbarre. Ad un australiano della SBS è stata sequestrata l’intera attrezzatura all’aeroporto di Minsk.
Da anni Lukashenko ed alcuni alti funzionari bielorussi non possono mettere piede in Unione europea e negli Stati Uniti, dove sono stati dichiarati “persone non benvenute”.
Rispetto ad un paio di anni fa la situazione economica è migliorata anche se l’economia bielorussa rimane sull’orlo dell’abisso. Finora Minsk si è salvata soltanto grazie all’aiuto finanziario di Mosca, che teme di trovarsi alle frontiere un governo pro-occidentale. In cambio di questo sostegno la Russia si è comprata gli oleodotti e i gasdotti in transito sul territorio bielorusso verso l’Europa.

APEC Leaders issued a Declaration at the conclusion of the 20th APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting in Vladivostok on Sunday, revealing pathways to strengthen the Asia-Pacific region’s prosperity and leadership in the global economy.

The Declaration outlines APEC Leaders’ view on addressing the challenges and downside risks within the global economic environment, including financial markets that remain fragile.

During Sunday’s session, Leaders were briefed by International Monetary Fund Managing Director, Christine Lagarde.

The Declaration details steps for building on the progress achieved by member economies in realizing APEC’s 2012 priorities:

  • Trade and Investment Liberalization, Regional Economic Integration
  • Strengthening Food Security
  • Establishing Reliable Supply Chains
  • Intensive Cooperation to Foster Innovative Growth

Several annexes accompany the Declaration:

Leaders also welcomed the invitation from Indonesia President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to meet in Bali in 2013.

Day 1 Friday, September 7

 

09:00 – 09:15 Welcome and opening ceremony

Conducted by Andrey Kostin, APEC CEO Summit Chairman

09:15 – 10:30Panel discussion:
Economic integration: benefits and unintended consequences
Moderator: Tian Wei, Anchor, CCTV
Discussion participants:
The Right Honourable John Key MP, Prime Minister of New Zealand
Igor Shuvalov, First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation
Dennis Nally, Chairman, PwC International
John Faraci, Chairman and CEO, International Paper

10:30 – 11:00Coffee break

11:00 – 12:00Panel discussion:
How many currencies does the world need?
Moderator: David Pilling, Asia Editor, Financial Times
Discussion participants:
Clifford Bennett, Chief Economist, White Crane Group
Andrey Kostin, Chairman of the Management Board, VTB Bank, APEC CEO Summit Chairman
Jing Ulrich, Managing Director and Chairman of Global Markets – China, JPMorgan
Chase

12:00 – 13:00Panel discussion:
Resources: what are the limits to growth?
Moderator: Dominic Barton, Managing Director, McKinsey & Company
Discussion participants:
Michael Klare, Director of the Five College Program in Peace and World Security Studies (PAWSS)
Igor Sechin, President, Rosneft (TBC)
Peter Voser, CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc

13:00 – 14:00Networking lunch

14:00 – 15:00Interactive sessions convened concurrently
Panel discussion:
Water: new global strategic resource
Moderator: Fedor Lukyanov, Editor-in-Chief of the Russia in Global Affairs magazine
Discussion participants:
His Excellency Truong Tan Sang, President of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam
His Excellency Sebastián Piñera, President of Chile
Umran Beba, Region President, Asia Pacific, PepsiCo
Chew Men Leong, Chief Executive, Singapore’s national water agency, PUB

Session: Food: feeding seven billion people
Moderator: Vyacheslav Nikonov, President, Polity Foundation, Deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
Discussion participants:
Samuel Allen, Chairman of the Board, John Deere & Co.
Craig Emerson, Minister for Trade and Competitiveness of Australia
Ning Gaoning, Chairman of COFCO
Kazuhito Yamashita, Research director of the Canon Institute for Global Studies
15:00 – 15:15Break

15:15 – 16:15Interactive sessions convened concurrently
Panel discussion:
Supply chains: ever more efficient, ever more vulnerable?
Moderator: Donald Almeida, Vice Chairman Clients and Markets, PwC
Discussion participants:
Igor Levitin, Adviser to the President of the Russian Federation
Ziyavudin Magomedov, Chairman of the Board of Summa Group
Scott Price, President and CEO, Walmart Asia

16:15 – 16:30Break

16:30 – 17:30Panel discussion:
Infrastructure for sustainable growth
Moderator: Aleksandr Gabuev, Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Kommersant Vlast’ Weekly
Discussion participants:
Oleg Budargin, Chairman, FGC UES
Pat Dawson, Asia Pacific President, The Dow Chemical Company
Oleg Deripaska, President, En+ Group, CEO, UC RUSAL
Vladimir Dmitriev, CEO VEB
Yang Bong Jin, CEO, Hyundai Energy and Resources Ltd.
17:30 – 18:00Coffee break

18:00 – 19:00Plenary session:
Address of His Excellency Mr. Vladimir Putin,
President of the Russian Federation

19:00 – 20:00Transfer to the Party venue
20:00 – 23:30CEO Summit Party
21:30 – 23:30Transfer to the Russky Island

22:00 – 23:30Nightcap conversation:
Russia in APEC: towards equal partnership
Moderator: Evelina Zakamskaya, Anchor, Russia-24 TV-Channel
Special guests:
Andrey Kostin, Chairman of the Management Board, VTB Bank, APEC CEO Summit Chairman
Ziyavudin Magomedov, Chairman of the Board of Summa Group
Jim Rogers, international investor, author of “A Gift to My Children”
Igor Shuvalov, First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation
James Turley, Chairman and CEO, Ernst & Young Global

 

Day 2 Saturday, September 8

 

08:00 – 08:45 Interactive morning sessions convened concurrently

Panel discussion:
Emerging multinationals: joining the club
Moderator: Gordon Orr, Chairman, Asia, McKinsey & Company
Discussion participants:

His Excellency Lien Chan, Leader’s Representative of Chinese Taipei

Rado Antolovic, CEO, Novorossiysk Commercial Sea Port
John Quelch, Dean, Vice President and Distinguished Professor of International Management, the China Europe International Business School (CEIBS, Shanghai)

Session: Technologies: the next big thing
Moderator: Vijay Vaitheeswaran, China‘s Business Editor, The Economist
Discussion participants:
Saeed Amidi, Сo-founder & CEO of Plug and Play Tech Center
Anatoly Chubais, CEO and Chairman of the Executive Board, Rosnano
Artyom Kudryavtsev, President, TransTeleCom
John Oyler, Founder and CEO of BeiGene (Biotech)

8:45 – 09:00Break

09:00 – 09:30Address of His Excellency Mr. Hu Jintao, President of the People’s Republic of China
09:30 – 10:00Coffee break

10:00 – 11:00Interactive sessions convened concurrently
Panel discussion:
Making cities fit for business, their people and the planet
Moderator: Bill Hutchison, Executive Director, Center for Smart Cities Innovation, Ernst & Young
Discussion participants:
Leung Chun-ying, Chief Executive, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Sergey Sobyanin, Mayor of Moscow
Oleg Govorun, Minister of Regional Development of the Russian Federation

Session: Education today, success tomorrow
Moderator: Tatyana Malkina, journalist, editor-in-chief of the Journal of Russian Ideas
Discussion participants:
The Hon Julia Gillard, Prime Minister of Australia
Dmitry Livanov, Minister of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
Sir Michael Barber, Chief Education Adviser, Pearson
Sergey Ivanets, Rector of the Far Eastern Federal University
Andreas Schleicher, Special Advisor on Education Policy, OECD PISA

11:00 – 11:15Break

11:15 – 11:45APEC Leader interaction:
His Excellency Mr. Felipe Calderon, President of Mexico From Los Cabos to Vladivostok: G20’s Impact on Global Economy Growth
11:45 – 12:00Break

12:00 – 12:30APEC leader interaction:
The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State of the United States of America(TBC)

 

12:30 – 13:00 Coffee break
13:00 – 13:30 Address of His Excellency Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, President of Indonesia
13:30 – 14:30 Networking lunch
14:30 – 15:30 Interactive sessions convened concurrently
Panel discussion:Emerging markets middle class: the new consumer Moderator: Kaori Enjoji, Tokyo Bureau Chief, CNBC Asia Pacific Discussion participants:

Rupert Keeley, Senior Vice President, PayPal Europe and Asia Pacific

Bernd Schmitt, Executive Director, Institute on Asian Consumer Insight

Wang Hongzhang, Chairman, China Construction Bank

Session: Women in charge means fewer man-made disastersModerator: Marina Kim, Presenter, Russia TV channelDiscussion participants:Robert Hormats, Under Secretary of State of the United States of America for Economic Growth, Energy, and the EnvironmentHu Shuli, Editor-in-Chief, Caixin Media

Olga Sloutsker, President of Russian Fitness Group

Artem Volynets, CEO, En+ Group

Conf. room 2
15:30 – 16:00 Coffee break

 

16:00 – 17:00 Interactive sessions convened concurrently
Debate:Has capitalism lost its compass? Moderator: Peter Lavelle, Host, RT Special guests:

David Daokui Li, Professor at the Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management Jim Rogers, international investor, author of “A Gift to My Children”

Chandran Nair, Founder of the Global Institute For Tomorrow (GIFT)

Hernando de Soto, President of the Institute for Liberty and Democracy (ILD)

Conf. hall
Session:Health is wealth Moderator: Diane Brady, Senior Editor, Bloomberg Businessweek Discussion participants:Ian McCrae, CEO, Orion Health

Craig Mundie, Chief Research and Strategy Officer, Microsoft

Dominic Caruso, CFO, Johnson & Johnson

Gita Wirjawan, Indonesia Trade Minister

Conf. room 1
17:00 – 17:15 Break
17:15 – 17:30 Closing ceremony

 

«Китай — новая мировая держава, Россия — ностальгическая страна с нелегким будущим. Уже два десятилетия бывшие партнеры по коммунистической идеологии имеют различную судьбу. И предстоящий саммит АТЭС похож на триумфальную церемонию для второй по величине экономики мира. Особенно из-за уже объявленного отсутствия во Владивостоке президента США Барака Обамы.
Если бы в 1989 году, когда милиция стреляла по демонстрантам на площади Тяньаньмэнь, а международное общество с интересом и надеждой взирало на советскую перестройку, какой-нибудь специалист спрогнозировал нынешний сценарий, его бы наверняка упрятали в желтый дом.
Что же произошло в Поднебесной? Случилось чудо? Нет…
Долгие годы в России я слышал, что, мол, «мы, как китайцы, должны были следовать политике мелких шагов, а вместо этого перешли к рыночной экономике методом шоковой терапии». Такие вещи у нас в Италии называют «городскими легендами», которые не имеют ничего общего с реальностью…. »

Статья Джузеппе Д’Амато Московский Комсомолец № 26032 от 4 сентября 2012 г. Giuseppe D’Amato Moskovskij Komsomolets.

 APEC was founded as an informal consultative forum to promote economic cooperation, encompassing, as members, the leading economies in the region. When APEC admitted three new members during the third APEC Ministerial Meeting in Seoul in November 1991, the protocol was accepted to refer to the three new member economies as the People’s Republic of China; Hong Kong, China; and Chinese Taipei. As such, APEC’s members are always referred to as “Economies” rather than countries or nations. The use or display of national flags, symbols or anthems is prohibited and only simple nameplates of the member economies are displayed at any APEC function.

 Today APEC includes 21 Asia-Pacific economies. APEC member economies are Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Hong Kong China, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, the United States, and Vietnam.
Members account for 54.9% of the world’s gross domestic product, 47.1% of the world’s goods and services trade, 44.5% of the world’s total accumulated direct investments, and 39.9% of the world’s population.

APEC–2012 declared priorities:

APEC – Russky Island from apec2012.ru

 trade and investment liberalization, regional economic integration, strengthening food security, establishing reliable supply chains,intensive cooperation to foster innovative growth.

 Russia proposes discussing the long-term prospects of regional and global integration, sustainable growth and new challenges to trade and investment liberalization, elimination of trade and investment barriers for small and medium-sized enterprises, and establishment of reliable supply chains.

  The two days of the CEO Summit (Sept. 7th– 8th) will be devoted to an exchange of ideas between business and government leaders on the advantages and adverse effects of economic integration, the prospects for global and regional currencies, infrastructure development for economic growth, and the future of capitalism in general. Other sessions will include focus on the development of cities in a rapidly changing world, the emergence and role of transnational corporations, and the growth of the middle class in emerging markets.

  In 2007 Russky Island was chosen as the site for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Leaders’ Week (APEC). Large-scale construction was launched on the island.
Russky Island is located in the Peter the Great Gulf and is part of Vladivostok’s Frunzensky district. The island is sometimes called the Far East’s Kronstadt. The Eastern Bosphorus Strait separates it from the Muravyov-Amursky Peninsula where Vladivostok, the capital of Russia’s Primorye Territory, lies.

Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Chicago on 20 May 2012 

 We, the Heads of State and Government of the member countries of the North Atlantic Alliance, have gathered in Chicago to renew our commitment to our vital transatlantic bond; take stock of progress in, and reconfirm our commitment to, our operations in Afghanistan, Kosovo and elsewhere; ensure the Alliance has the capabilities it needs to deal with the full range of threats; and strengthen our wide range of partnerships.

20. NATO and the EU share common values and strategic interests. The EU is a unique and essential partner for NATO.  Fully strengthening this strategic partnership, as agreed by our two organisations and enshrined in the Strategic Concept, is particularly important in the current environment of austerity; NATO and the EU should continue to work to enhance practical cooperation in operations, broaden political consultations, and cooperate more fully in capability development.  NATO and the EU are working side by side in crisis management operations, in a spirit of mutual reinforcement, and in particular in Afghanistan, Kosovo and fighting piracy.  NATO recognises the importance of a stronger and more capable European defence.  NATO also recognises non-EU Allies’ ongoing concerns and their significant contributions to strengthening the EU’s capacities to address common security challenges. For the strategic partnership between NATO and the EU, non-EU Allies’ fullest involvement in these efforts is essential.   In this context, NATO will work closely with the EU, as agreed, to ensure that our Smart Defence and the EU’s Pooling and Sharing initiatives are complementary and mutually reinforcing; we welcome the efforts of the EU, in particular in the areas of air-to-air refuelling, medical support, maritime surveillance and training.  We also welcome the national efforts in these and other areas by European Allies and Partners.  We also encourage the Secretary General to continue his dialogue with the EU High Representative with a view to making our cooperation more effective, and to report to the Council in time for the next Summit.

 35.  An independent, sovereign and stable Ukraine, firmly committed to democracy and the rule of law, is key to Euro-Atlantic security.  Marking the fifteenth anniversary of the NATO-Ukraine Charter on a Distinctive Partnership, we welcome Ukraine’s commitment to enhancing political dialogue and interoperability with NATO, as well as its contributions to NATO-led operations and new offers made.  We note the recent elimination of Ukraine’s highly enriched uranium in March 2012, which demonstrates a proven commitment to non-proliferation. Recalling our decisions in relation to Ukraine and our Open Door policy stated at the Bucharest and Lisbon Summits, NATO is ready to continue to develop its cooperation with Ukraine and assist with the implementation of reforms in the framework of the NATO-Ukraine Commission and the Annual National Programme (ANP).  Noting the principles and commitments enshrined in the NATO-Ukraine Charter and the ANP, we are concerned by the selective application of justice and what appear to be politically motivated prosecutions, including of leading members of the opposition, and the conditions of their detention.  We encourage Ukraine to address the existing shortcomings of its judicial system to ensure full compliance with the rule of law and the international agreements to which it is a party.  We also encourage Ukraine to ensure free, fair and inclusive Parliamentary elections this autumn.

 36. NATO-Russia cooperation is of strategic importance as it contributes to creating a common space of peace, stability and security.  We remain determined to build a lasting and inclusive peace, together with Russia, in the Euro-Atlantic area, based upon the goals, principles and commitments of the NATO-Russia Founding Act and the Rome Declaration.  We want to see a true strategic partnership between NATO and Russia, and we will act accordingly with the expectation of reciprocity from Russia.

37.  This year, we mark the tenth anniversary of the establishment of the NATO-Russia Council (NRC) and the fifteenth anniversary of the NATO-Russia Founding Act.  We welcome important progress in our cooperation with Russia over the years.  At the same time, we differ on specific issues and there is a need to improve trust, reciprocal transparency, and predictability in order to realise the full potential of the NRC.  In this context, we intend to raise with Russia in the NRC Allied concerns about Russia’s stated intentions regarding military deployments close to Alliance borders.  Mindful of the goals, principles and commitments which underpin the NRC, and on this firm basis, we urge Russia to meet its commitments with respect to Georgia, as mediated by the EU on 12 August and 8 September 2008 3.  We continue to be concerned by the build-up of Russia’s military presence on Georgia’s territory and continue to call on Russia to ensure free access for humanitarian assistance and international observers.

 38. NATO and Russia share common security interests and face common challenges and our practical achievements together reflect that reality.  Today, we continue to value the important role of the NRC as a forum for frank and honest political dialogue – including on subjects where we disagree – and for promoting practical cooperation. Our cooperation with Russia on issues related to Afghanistan – notably the two-way transit arrangements offered by Russia in support of ISAF, our joint training of counter narcotics personnel from Afghanistan, Central Asia, and Pakistan, and the NRC Helicopter Maintenance Trust Fund in support of a key ANSF need – is a sign of our common determination to build peace and stability in that region.  NATO-Russia counter-terrorism cooperation has expanded and all NRC nations will benefit from the lessons to be learned from the first civil-military NRC Counter-Terrorism exercise, and the capabilities available under the NRC aviation counter-terrorism programme which is now operational.  We also note with satisfaction our growing counter-piracy cooperation off the Horn of Africa.  We are committed to, and look forward to, further improving trust and reciprocal transparency in: defence matters; strategy; doctrines; military postures, including of non-strategic nuclear weapons in Europe; military exercises; arms control and disarmament; and we invite Russia to engage with the Alliance in discussing confidence-building measures covering these issues.

 47.  With our vision of a Euro-Atlantic area at peace, the persistence of protracted regional conflicts in South Caucasus and the Republic of Moldova continues to be a matter of great concern for the Alliance.  We welcome the constructive approach in the renewed dialogue on Transnistria in the 5+2 format, and encourage further efforts by all actors involved.  With respect to all these conflicts, we urge all parties to engage constructively and with reinforced political will in peaceful conflict resolution, and to respect the current negotiation formats.  We call on them all to avoid steps that undermine regional security and stability.  We remain committed in our support of the territorial integrity, independence, and sovereignty of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and the Republic of Moldova, and will also continue to support efforts towards a peaceful settlement of these regional conflicts, based upon these principles and the norms of international law, the United Nations Charter, and the Helsinki Final Act.

48. The Black Sea region continues to be important for Euro-Atlantic security.  We welcome the progress in consolidating regional cooperation and ownership, through effective use of existing initiatives and mechanisms, in the spirit of transparency, complementarity and inclusiveness.  We will continue to support, as appropriate, efforts based on regional priorities and dialogue and cooperation among the Black Sea states and with the Alliance.

 52. A stable and reliable energy supply, diversification of routes, suppliers and energy resources, and the interconnectivity of energy networks, remain of critical importance.  While these issues are primarily the responsibility of national governments and other international organisations concerned, NATO closely follows relevant developments in energy security.  Today, we have noted a progress report which outlines the concrete steps taken since our last Summit and describes the way forward to integrate, as appropriate, energy security considerations in NATO’s policies and activities.  We will continue to consult on energy security and further develop the capacity to contribute to energy security, concentrating on areas where NATO can add value.  To this end, we will work towards significantly improving the energy efficiency of our military forces; develop our competence in supporting the protection of critical energy infrastructure; and further develop our outreach activities in consultation with partners, on a case-by-case basis.  We welcome the offer to establish a NATO-accredited Energy Security Centre of Excellence in Lithuania as a contribution to NATO’s efforts in this area.  We task the Council to continue to refine NATO’s role in energy security in accordance with the principles and the guidelines agreed at the Bucharest Summit and the direction provided by the new Strategic Concept as well as the Lisbon decisions.  We task the Council to produce a further progress report for our next Summit.

 Complete TextNATO – Chicago.

Welcome

We are a group of long experienced European journalists and intellectuals interested in international politics and culture. We would like to exchange our opinion on new Europe and Russia.

Languages


Archives

Rossosch – Medio Don

Italiani in Russia, Ucraina, ex Urss


Our books


                  SCHOLL